Problem Description

The LeetCode problem asks us to generate all the possible subsets from a given list of unique integers. The term 'subset' refers to any combination of numbers that can be formed from the original list, including the empty set and the set itself. For instance, if the input is [1,2,3], then the subsets would include [], [1], [2], [3], [1,2], [1,3], [2,3], and [1,2,3]. The objective is to list down all these possibilities. We should also ensure that there are no duplicate subsets in the solution and the subsets can be returned in any order.

Flowchart Walkthrough

Let's analyze the problem on Leetcode 78, Subsets, using the Flowchart. Here's a detailed step-by-step explanation:

Is it a graph?

• No: The problem doesn't involve structures typically found in graph problems, such as nodes or edges directly.

Need to solve for kth smallest/largest?

• No: This problem is about generating all subsets, not finding a specific order or value like the kth element.

Involves Linked Lists?

• No: Subsets generation does not involve linked lists.

Does the problem have small constraints?

• Yes: Typically, the task involves generating subsets which, even if the input size grows, still handles small enough sets to manage within computational limits.

Brute force / Backtracking?

• Yes: Since the problem's domain allows for exploring all combinations (subsets) of a given set and is feasible within small constraints, using brute force or backtracking is effective. This method will explore all potential combinations by including or excluding each element.

Conclusion: Using the flowchart logic, a backtracking approach is suitable for generating all subsets of a given set as seen in Leetcode 78, Subsets. This aligns with the branching decision-making process required to include or exclude each element of the set iteratively.

Intuition

To solve the problem, we are using a concept known as Depth-First Search (DFS). The process involves exploring each element and deciding whether to include it in the current subset (t). At each step, we have the choice to either include or not include the current element in our subset before moving to the next element.

For example, if our set is [1, 2, 3], the DFS approach starts at the first element (1 then 2 then 3). For each element, we take two paths: in one path we include the element into the subset, and in the other, we do not.

Here's what the decision tree would look like for [1, 2, 3]:

1. Start with an empty subset [].
2. Choose whether to include 1 or not, resulting in subsets [] and [1].
3. For each of these subsets, choose whether to include 2, leading to [], [1], [2], and [1, 2].
4. Finally, for each of these, choose whether to include 3, ending with [], [1], [2], [1, 2], [3], [1, 3], [2, 3], and [1, 2, 3].

At the end of this process, we have explored all possible combinations, and our ans list contains all of them. Each recursive call represents a decision, and by exploring each decision, we exhaust all possibilities and build the power set.

Learn more about Backtracking patterns.

Solution Approach

The reference solution provided is a recursive approach using Depth-First Search (DFS) to build up all possible subsets. Here's a step-by-step explanation of how the code implements this algorithm:

• We define a helper function called dfs with the parameter i, which represents the current index in the nums array we are considering.

• The base case for the recursion is when i equals the length of nums. At this point, we know we've considered every element. We make a copy of the current subset t and append it to our answer list ans.

• If we haven't reached the end of the array, we have two choices: we can either include the current element or not. First, we choose not to include it by simply calling dfs(i + 1) without modifying t.

• After returning from the above call, we then decide to include the current element by appending nums[i] to t. Then we call dfs(i + 1) again to continue exploring further with the element included.

• After the second recursive call returns, we need to backtrack, which means removing the last element added to t, essentially undoing the decision to include the current element. This is done by calling t.pop().

• The initial call to dfs starts with index 0, indicating that we start exploring from the first element of the array.

• The algorithm uses a backtracking pattern, which is evident in the decision to include or not include an element and the subsequent reversal of that decision.

• The use of recursion and backtracking allows us to explore all possible combinations of elements, resulting in the power set of nums. This is because at each step we go as deep as we can into one combination (depth-first), and then we backtrack to explore a new one.

• The code avoids the formation of duplicate subsets by relying on the fact that nums contains unique elements and by systematically exploring all possible combinations without repeating them.

The data structure used to keep track of the current subset under construction is a simple list t. The list ans collects the subsets as they are constructed. The reason we take a slice t[:] while appending to ans is to pass a copy of the current subset instead of a reference to t, which will continue to be modified as the algorithm proceeds.

To summarize, the solution uses a DFS approach to recursively build subsets and backtrack when necessary, adding each complete subset to the solution once all elements have been considered.

Example Walkthrough

Let's take a smaller example set [1, 2] to illustrate the solution approach.

1. Initially, our subset t is empty, and we start at index 0. The first decision is whether to include 1 in our subset or not.

2. We first choose not to include 1, so our subset t remains []. We call dfs(1) to handle the next element (index 1 now refers to 2 in our set).

3. At index 1, again we decide whether to include 2 or not. First, we choose not to include it, so subset t remains as []. We've now considered every element, so we append this subset to our answer list ans, which now has [[]].

4. Backtracking to the previous choice for 2, this time we include it in the subset t, which now becomes [2]. Again, each element has been considered, so we add [2] to ans, which becomes [[], [2]].

5. Now we have finished exploring the possibilities for index 1 (with element 2), so we backtrack to the situation before including 2. This means we remove 2 from our subset t by calling t.pop().

6. We then backtrack to the first decision at index 0 and choose the path where we include 1 in our subset. Now, t contains [1]. We move to index 1 by calling dfs(1) to make decisions for 2.

7. At index 1, we start with decision not to include 2 first, which means our subset t does not change, and is [1]. Since we are at the end, we add this to ans, resulting in [[], [2], [1]].

8. Finally, we include 2 in our subset to have [1, 2] and since all elements are now considered, we include this subset in ans, resulting in [[], [2], [1], [1, 2]].

Throughout this process, we've been adding our subset t only when we have considered all elements, which means when i is equal to the length of nums. This ensures we include every possible combination in our ans, the list of all subsets ([], [1], [2], [1, 2] for our example).

The solution methodically explores all combinations through recursive DFS calls and includes backtracking to make sure that we cover different subsets as we make different decisions (to include/not include an element). The incremental nature of adding to the subset t, along with the corresponding backtracking step, ensures the completeness and correctness of the algorithm.

Solution Implementation

Time and Space Complexity

The provided code is a solution for finding all subsets of a given set of numbers. This is implemented using a depth-first search (DFS) approach with backtracking.

Time Complexity:

Each number has two possibilities: either it is part of a subset or it is not. Thus, for each element in the input list nums, we are making two recursive calls. This results in a binary decision tree with a total of 2^n leaf nodes (where n is the number of elements in nums).

This leads to a total of 2^n function calls. In each call, we deal with O(1) complexity operations (excluding the recursive calls), such as appending an element to the temporary list t or appending the list to ans.

Therefore, the time complexity of the code is O(2^n).

Space Complexity:

For space complexity, we consider two factors: the space used by the recursive call stack and the space used to store the output.

1. Recursive Call Stack: In the worst case, the maximum depth of the recursive call stack is n (the number of elements in nums), as we make a decision for each element. Hence, the space used by the call stack is O(n).

2. Output Space: The space used to store all subsets is the dominating factor. Since there are 2^n subsets and each subset can be at most n elements, the output space complexity is O(n * 2^n).

However, it is important to note that in the context of subsets or combinations problems, the space used to store the output is often considered as auxiliary space and not part of the space complexity used for algorithmic analysis. If we only consider the auxiliary space (ignoring the space for the output), the space complexity would be O(n).

Taking both aspects into account, the total space complexity of the code is O(n * 2^n) considering the space for the output, or O(n) if we are only considering auxiliary space.

Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.